What can I do if an Executor is not following the will?

Executors who fail to follow the will can be challenged, held personally liable for losses, and removed from their role by the court.

Beneficiaries who suspect an executor is not following the will have several legal options under English and Welsh law. The steps you take will depend on the nature of the problem, whether probate has already been granted, and how the executor responds to initial contact.

At Awdry Law, our contentious probate solicitors help beneficiaries and families resolve executor disputes efficiently and sensitively. We understand these situations are emotionally difficult, and we work to protect your interests at every stage.

What happens if an executor doesn’t follow the will?

An executor of a will has a legal duty to administer the deceased’s estate in accordance with the terms of the will and the law. If an executor does not follow the will, they are in breach of their legal duties.

Executors owe a fiduciary duty to the estate and its beneficiaries, meaning they must act in the best interests of the estate at all times, not in their own personal interest.

Common examples of an executor not following the will include

  • Distributing assets incorrectly
  • Selling estate property at undervalued prices
  • Failing to pay debts or inheritance tax
  • Refusing to communicate with beneficiaries
  • Causing unreasonable delays in the administration process

The consequences for an executor who breaches their duties can be serious. A court can order the executor to repay money or return assets to the estate. The executor can be removed and replaced. Personal liability may apply even where the breach was a genuine mistake rather than intentional misconduct.

What is a breach of executor duties?

A breach of executor duties occurs when an executor fails to carry out their legal responsibilities properly. Under section 25 of the Administration of Estates Act 1925, executors are required to collect the deceased’s assets and administer the estate according to law.

Breach of duty can take many forms, including failing to distribute the estate in accordance with the will, failing to account for liabilities before making distributions, selling assets below market value, neglecting estate property, and failing to keep accurate financial records. All of these are breaches of executor duties.

Self-dealing is one of the most serious forms of breach. An executor who takes estate assets for personal gain, sells property to themselves at a discount, or prioritises their own inheritance over other beneficiaries is acting in clear breach of their fiduciary obligations.

What constitutes serious misconduct of an executor?

Serious misconduct of an executor goes beyond simple mistakes or minor delays.

Serious executor misconduct includes fraud, theft from the estate, deliberate mismanagement, prolonged refusal to communicate with beneficiaries, and wilful disregard for the terms of the will.

Courts distinguish between honest errors and deliberate wrongdoing. An executor who makes a genuine administrative mistake may still face personal liability, but the court has discretion to relieve them of liability under section 61 of the Trustee Act 1925, where they acted honestly and reasonably.

Serious misconduct carries no such protection. Fraud and theft by an executor can result in criminal prosecution as well as civil claims, and there is no time limit for bringing a claim against an executor based on fraudulent breach of duty.

How to prove executor misconduct in England and Wales

Proving executor misconduct requires evidence that the executor breached their duty and that this breach caused a loss to the estate or its beneficiaries. Keep written records of all communication with the executor.

Emails, letters, and text messages that show a pattern of delay, refusal to engage, or contradictory statements are valuable evidence.

Beneficiaries can request an inventory and account of the estate’s financial dealings.

Residuary beneficiaries, who are those inheriting a share of the remaining estate, are entitled to see the estate accounts.

Discrepancies in these accounts, unexplained transactions, or missing assets can support a claim of misconduct.

Valuation reports, property sale records, and bank statements can demonstrate that assets were sold at undervalued prices or that estate funds were diverted. A solicitor experienced in contentious probate can help you gather and present this evidence effectively.

How can I deal with an unresponsive executor of a will?

An unresponsive executor can create real problems for beneficiaries. Estate administration stalls, bank accounts remain frozen, property may decline in value, and beneficiaries are left without their inheritance.

  1. Write to the executor: The first step is to write to the executor directly, setting out your concerns in clear terms. Request a specific update on the estate’s progress, including details of assets, liabilities, and a timeline for distribution. Keep a copy of this letter, as it may be needed as evidence later.
  2. Instruct a solicitor to write on your behalf: A formal solicitor’s letter often prompts action where personal correspondence has not. The letter can outline the executor’s legal obligations and warn of the consequences of continued inaction, including potential court proceedings.
  3. Consider mediation: Mediation offers a less adversarial route to resolution. An independent mediator can facilitate communication between the parties and help reach an agreed way forward. Mediation avoids the cost and stress of court proceedings and can preserve family relationships.
  4. Apply to the court: Court action becomes necessary when other approaches have failed. Beneficiaries can apply for an order compelling the executor to provide an inventory and account of the estate. The court can compel the executor to act, or remove and replace them entirely under section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985.

Our executor dispute solicitors have the expertise and experience to support you through sensitive and complex disagreements with co-executors and beneficiaries.

Can an executor be held personally liable?

Executors can be held personally liable for financial losses caused by their breach of duty. Personal liability means the executor must compensate the estate or beneficiaries from their own funds, but not from the estate itself.

Executor liability is unlimited. An executor becomes potentially liable from the moment they take up the role. Liability may apply whether the loss resulted from a deliberate act, negligence, or an honest mistake.

Where multiple executors are appointed, liability is joint and several, meaning each executor is individually responsible for the full amount of any loss.

Common situations that trigger personal liability include distributing the estate too early (before the six-month creditor period expires), failing to pay inheritance tax on time or at all (resulting in HMRC penalties and interest), selling property below market value, and misapplying estate funds.

A claim against an executor for breach of duty can be brought up to 12 years from the date the right to receive the estate accrued. Claims based on fraud have no limitation period.

Can an executor withhold money from beneficiaries?

An executor cannot withhold money from beneficiaries without a lawful reason. The executor’s job is to distribute the estate in accordance with the will, and deliberate withholding of inheritance is a breach of duty.

There are limited circumstances where distribution may be legitimately delayed. The executor may need to wait for the grant of probate, settle outstanding debts, pay inheritance tax, or allow the six-month window for potential claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. Complex estates involving property sales, foreign assets, or disputed valuations can take longer to administer.

Complex estates involving property sales, foreign assets, or disputed valuations can also take longer to administer. These are recognised reasons for delay, not grounds for a breach of duty claim.

The key distinction is between a lawful delay with proper communication and an unlawful withholding of funds. An executor who refuses to explain why distribution is delayed, or who provides no timeline, may be acting in breach of their duties.

How do you force an executor to act?

Forcing an executor to act depends on whether probate has already been granted. The legal process differs at each stage.

Before the grant of probate: a beneficiary or next of kin can apply to the court to have a different person appointed to administer the estate. The applicant should first write to the executor warning them of this intended action. This warning alone is sometimes enough to prompt the executor into acting.

After the grant of probate: beneficiaries can apply to the Probate Registry for an order requiring the executor to exhibit an inventory and account of the estate. This application is made by claim form supported by an affidavit. The order can be endorsed with a penal notice, meaning the executor risks imprisonment for non-compliance.

An application under section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985 allows the court to remove the executor and appoint a replacement. The court will consider the executor’s conduct, the nature of the estate, and the interests of the beneficiaries when making its decision.

Who can challenge an executor of a will?

Beneficiaries named in the will are the most common challengers, but they are not the only people who can take action. Co-executors, creditors of the estate, and individuals entitled under the intestacy rules (where the will is invalid) can all challenge an executor’s conduct.

Any person with a legitimate interest in the proper administration of the estate can bring a complaint to the court. The court’s primary concern is protecting the estate and ensuring the deceased’s wishes are honoured.

What action can be taken against an executor of a will?

Several legal remedies are available to beneficiaries and other interested parties when an executor is not following the will.

  • Removal and replacement of the executor under section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985. The court can appoint a substitute executor or an independent administrator.
  • An order for an inventory and account under section 25 of the Administration of Estates Act 1925, requiring the executor to disclose all financial dealings with the estate.
  • A devastavit claim (a claim for waste or misapplication of estate assets) seeking compensation from the executor personally for losses caused by their breach of duty, including damages, an account of profits, and reversal of improper transactions.
  • Lodging a caveat at the Probate Registry to temporarily prevent the grant of probate being issued while concerns are investigated. A caveat lasts six months and can be renewed.
  • Court directions compelling the executor to take specific actions, such as distributing assets or applying for probate.
Is there a time limit for an executor to finish their duties?

There is no strict legal time limit for an executor to complete the administration of an estate in England and Wales. The general expectation is that estate administration should be completed within 12 months from the date of death. This period is known as the “executor’s year.”

The executor’s year is not a hard deadline. Beneficiaries cannot demand distribution within this period, and the executor is not automatically in breach if administration takes longer. Complex estates involving property sales, foreign assets, inheritance tax calculations, or disputes can legitimately take longer than 12 months.

Specific tax deadlines do apply. Inheritance tax must be paid within six months of the end of the month in which the deceased died. HMRC charges interest on late payments. The executor is personally responsible for ensuring tax is paid on time.

Unreasonable delay without explanation is a different matter. An executor who causes unnecessary delays, refuses to communicate with beneficiaries, or fails to provide a timeline for distribution may be challenged and potentially removed.

What happens if an executor delays?

Executor delays can cause real financial harm to the estate and its beneficiaries. Property left unoccupied may fall into disrepair. Unpaid inheritance tax accrues interest. Investment values may change. Beneficiaries are unable to access funds they may urgently need.

Beneficiaries cannot apply to have an executor removed simply because they are slow. The court requires evidence that the delay is unreasonable and is causing harm to the estate. A delay caused by external factors, such as HMRC processing times or difficulty locating beneficiaries, is different from a delay caused by the executor’s inaction.

The court expects parties to have attempted resolution before issuing proceedings. Writing to the executor, instructing a solicitor, and attempting mediation should all be explored before applying to the court for intervention.

What disqualifies an executor?

There is no automatic disqualification for executors in the same way as there is for company directors. A person can act as executor provided they are over 18 and have mental capacity. A criminal record does not automatically disqualify someone, though it may be relevant if a court is asked to remove them.

The court can remove an executor on the grounds of misconduct, incapacity, persistent failure to act, conflict of interest, or a complete breakdown of trust between the executor and the beneficiaries. The test is whether the executor’s continued involvement is harmful to the proper administration of the estate.

How to resolve family conflict over inheritance

Inheritance disputes between family members are among the most emotionally difficult legal situations. Grief, long-standing family tensions, and perceived unfairness can all contribute to conflict.

Early communication is essential. Many disputes escalate unnecessarily because parties do not feel heard or informed. A solicitor acting on your behalf can facilitate structured communication and set out your concerns clearly and professionally, reducing the risk of the dispute becoming entrenched.

Mediation is often an effective route to resolution in family inheritance disputes. A trained mediator helps all parties discuss their concerns in a neutral environment and work towards an agreed outcome. Mediation is faster, cheaper, and less damaging to relationships than court proceedings.

Court action should be a last resort, but it is sometimes necessary to protect your position. The courts have wide powers to intervene in estate administration and can make binding orders to resolve disputes.

Get specialist legal advice on executor disputes…

Dealing with an executor who is not following the will is stressful and can cause uncertainty. The sooner you take advice, the sooner the situation can be resolved and your inheritance protected.

At Awdry Law, our contentious probate solicitors have extensive experience in resolving executor disputes throughout England and Wales.

To speak with one of our specialist probate dispute solicitors in confidence, contact us today by calling our team on 01225 417111 or completing the quick and easy enquiry form below.

Quick enquiry.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name(Required)

News

FAQs about our conveyancing app

Have you heard that we have an Awdry Law App, specifically for our conveyancing clients? The App provides a straightforward and seamless experience when it comes to buying or selling your home.
Awdry Law - Legal Solicitors in Bath, Chippenham, Devizes, Marlborough, Royal Wootton Bassett and Swindon.
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.